Reiki Massage

Reiki Massage

Should Reiki Really Be Considered A Massage Therapy?

The practice of Reiki is taught in many massage schools. There is debate about the categorization of this therapy as a form of massage. So is it massage, mystical healing or just New Age hocus pocus?

I don’t know about you but when I go for a massage I expect the massage therapist to use their hands, fingers and maybe even their elbows to loosen my stress-laden muscles. There is nothing more delightful than an experienced pair of hands that helps to expunge all of the bad stuff from my body that causes me to become tense, anxious and, perhaps, a bit unpleasant to be around sometimes.

I still vividly remember a visit with a physical therapist for a problem that I was having with a disk in my neck. The disk was pinching a nerve which was causing pain in my neck, back and arm.

A particularly annoying area was near my shoulder above my shoulder blade. As I sat in a massage chair, the therapist used her elbow to dig right into the affected area with a force that caused some serious discomfort. But when I left that morning, the pain was almost gone. Now that was massage!

The Concept of Reiki

Recently, I was introduced to the concept of Reiki. I was reading up on the various forms of massage therapy and, quite frequently, Reiki was listed as a therapeutic option or as part of the curriculum at a massage school.

Further reading about Reiki has caused me to question references to Reiki in the same context as massage. In fact, I began to wonder why Reiki was included in references to massage at all. And I’m not the only one.

Massage is generally defined as “the manipulation of the soft tissues of the body for therapeutic purposes, healing or relaxation.” I would think that “manipulation” is the operative word here. The practice of Reiki takes a quite different approach. Like Shiatsu massage, Reiki seeks to balance “ki” or “life force energy” within the body.

The theory, according to ancient Oriental philosophy, is that if this energy is out of balance in the body, or is depleted, then an individual becomes susceptible to physical and emotional ailments. Practitioners of Reiki seek to channel energy into their clients in a manner that corrects imbalances and promotes healing.

However, based on the prescribed methods of practicing Reiki, there is no “manipulation” involved. In fact, in some cases, there is not even actual touch involved in Reiki treatments. That would certainly present a conflict between the generally accepted definition of massage and the practice of Reiki.

Where was Reiki developed?

Reiki, as practiced today, was developed by Dr. Mikao Usui, a minister and head of a Christian school in Japan. His students had asked him how Jesus healed. Usui did not have the answer but became fixated on discovering how Jesus had cured the ill and infirmed. ( I guess “because he was the Son of God” does not qualify as an acceptable answer.)

Dr. Usui spent years studying in Christian schools, Buddhist monasteries and temples. He found no answer to the healing question until he embarked on a 21 day fast. At the end of the fast he apparently had a revelatory experience that showed him the methods he had sought to understand.

He then set about on a healing ministry. Eventually, he shared his knowledge with Dr. Chujiro Hyashi who, in turn shared the knowledge with Mrs. Hawayo Takata who trained 22 Reiki Masters who then shared the knowledge with thousands of others.

Essentially, Reiki transfers energy from the Reiki practitioner to the patient. Actually, Reiki teaches that the patient draws this energy from the practitioner thus giving the patient an active role and ultimate responsibility for their own healing. The energy is then realigned and balanced and harmony is restored in the body.

Not a Religion But Lots of Spirituality

Though it is not a religion there is a great deal of spirituality at work in Reiki. God or a Universal Life Force is acknowledged and recognized as the source of all life energy. Though there are specific principles involved in Reiki, the actual methods are quite similar to the “laying on of hands” practiced by faith healers of many religious denominations. But “laying on of hands” is not quite the same as “the manipulation of soft tissue” required to be defined as massage.

There are a couple of issues here. First, massage as a stand alone practice, has struggled to be recognized by the medical establishment as a legitimate form of therapy and healing. Under the auspices of physical therapy, massage is readily accepted and practiced to restore muscular function and to assist in the rehabilitative process.

However, there is the view by many that massage therapy is somewhat of a “mongrel” healing application with touches of mainstream medicine, alternative medicine, holistic, health, New Age cultism, sexual indulgence and mystical fakery. The simple fact is the “the manipulation of soft tissue” has been proven and is accepted as a healing modality.

It is the desire to include any healing avocation that involves touch, or even the close proximity of hand to body, under the heading of massage that creates confusion and causes suspicion.

The Scientific Community

Scientists and doctors have dismissed Reiki as a placebo that encourages patients to feel better because they are supposed to feel better. Other questions about the motivation of practitioners is the fact that Dr. Usui, the founder of Reiki, determined that there must be an “energy exchange” between Reiki healer and Reiki patient to invest the patient in the healing process. This investment is monetary in most cases and is a core principle of Reiki.

Another problem with Reiki being considered a form of massage is that some states require that practitioners of Reiki be licensed as massage therapists. Many Reiki practitioners dispute this categorization specifically because of the distinction between Reiki and massage as stated in the definitions presented earlier in this article.

So, Reiki has a bit of a schizophrenic personality. On the one hand, courses teaching Reiki are offered in many massage schools.  On the other hand, many practitioners don’t consider themselves massage therapists.

So, far be it from me to try and settle this dispute in one article. Reiki may or may not be a truly effective form of healing. All I know is that I still have difficulty categorizing Reiki as massage. I think there may be some “manipulation” of the definition of massage required to justify the inclusion of Reiki.





5 Enlightened Replies

Trackback  •  Comments RSS

  1. Len thomas says:

    Reiki is not massage!
    Reiki is a living energy, increaseing the vibrations of the energy centres.
    Massage is an ability to, by manipitation of physical body parts to relax and to let-go of negative binding blockages.
    Reiki as an energy therapy relases and relaxasus the psychical/ emotional binding blockages within the energy bodies.
    Two different aspects of life.

  2. Malcolm Vandehaar says:

    Firstly Reiki is not a form of massage. A Reiki channel that performs a massage will flow the Life Force Energy to there client receiving the massage. Reiki responds to the application of touch, therefore when ever a Reiki channels touches (anything, as everything is energy in our universe) there will be a flow of energy. The benefits are remarkable for for Massage Therapist and there clients. Also the History given above is no longer applicable. Dr Usui was never a Christian Minister and we have now research from Dr Usui notes that gives a more accurate account of what and how he rediscovered this wonderful gift of unconditional Love. Malcolm R. Vandehaar Reiki Master/Teacher since 1993.

  3. Claudia says:

    Over all a pretty general and one sided article, but you are writing for Massage Schools Guide, so being unbiased probably is not an option.

    Firstly, pain during massage is not the status quo. And stating “now that was a massage” is misleading. Digging an elbow in the cervical spine is not wise at all. I can help that issue without causing pain.

    Have you heard of Richard Gerber? He wrote a book discussing vibrational and energy measurements. He did an number of studies with positive results.

    You said:
    Scientists and doctors have dismissed Reiki as a placebo that encourages patients to feel better because they are supposed to feel better.

    Check into all the hospitals actually recommending Reiki to their patients. Even Dr. OZ has allowed Reiki in his surgery suite. Check out Pamela Miles.

    I think maybe you do not understand how Reiki actually works. Have you had Reiki?
    I offer “Reiki Massage” to clients. I do hands on Reiki often with gentle compression, rocking, and massage. My clients like it and come back. It is not a placebo. It works.


  4. Currently, numerous customers have currently made testimonies regarding the performance of the Reiki procedure. It has currently healed them and has done an amazing healing. This paves the method for Reiki recovering to be purchased by other individuals.
    Mrs. Shake

Post a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *